Windsurfing forums Asia
May 21, 2012, 03:34:45 AM
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News
: Bluefinz Forum 2008
if you can't remember your password, click
here
for help.
Home
Help
Search
Calendar
Login
Register
Windsurfing forums Asia
>
windsurfing bulletin boards
>
Windsurfing Forum
(Moderators:
sukhdev
,
Meng
,
P.J.
) >
Cam v non cam on hyper style boards
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
« previous
next »
Print
Author
Topic: Cam v non cam on hyper style boards (Read 508 times)
<Allan>
Guest
Cam v non cam on hyper style boards
«
on:
February 01, 2003, 09:02:00 PM »
Hiya, Well I believ like yourself that a good twin cam is good enough on hyper, but what about some of the freerace no cams out there on the market!!!
Will they work well, do they have enough bottom end power to power up such a wide board eg 76cm in 8.5 or 9m??
Whats your thoughts???
Logged
sukhdev
Administrator
Xtreme Veteran
Offline
Posts: 1333
Cam v non cam on hyper style boards
«
Reply #1 on:
February 01, 2003, 10:02:00 PM »
Allan, only freerace no cam I've tested on the hyper is the Sailworks Retro (2002 and 2003); though I hope to be testing the GTR on it soon.
For the Retro at least I believe it actually has more bottom end than most cammed sails; it can be rigged to generate tons of low end. The 9.0 works well on the hyper though I prefer to rig it over the downhaul specs (about 4cm over specs) and use additional outhaul to create a smooth foil. I'm a believer in the "rig for speed and pump like mad if you need power" school. Rigging for pure low end on a speed oriented board like the Hyper (or any slalom hull) results in a heavy feeling, draggy rig once apparent wind sets in.
Logged
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
Print
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
windsurfing bulletin boards
-----------------------------
=> Windsurfing Forum
=> Marketplace (Buy/Sell)
=> Beginner's Forum
=> Calendar, Events, Race notices, results
Loading...